On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 05:10:20PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/19/2014 12:54 AM, Hu Tao wrote:
> > From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> > 
> > This option provides the infrastructure for binding guest NUMA nodes
> > to host NUMA nodes.  For example:
> > 
> >  -object memory-ram,size=1024M,policy=membind,host-nodes=0,id=ram-node0 \
> >  -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0,memdev=ram-node0 \
> >  -object 
> > memory-ram,size=1024M,policy=interleave,host-nodes=1-3,id=ram-node1 \
> >  -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=1,memdev=ram-node1
> > 
> > The option replaces "-numa mem".
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Conflicts:
> >     include/sysemu/sysemu.h
> >     numa.c
> 
> Until this patch is taken upstream, a 'Conflicts:' section in your
> commit message doesn't make sense.  That is useful for downstream or
> stable branch backports, but doesn't belong on the mainline branch.

I think this was introduced during rebase. Will fix.

Thanks.

Reply via email to