On 12 March 2014 19:41, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > Ew. No. It would be easier to just implement setend, even if badly.
Agreed. > For my part, the endian-aware load/store opcodes I alluded to last > August are now in. Yes, it would be fairly straightforward to implement setend now. I haven't actually looked at it, though, because the only thing that uses it is this raspi memcmp code, and there's a workaround for that. So other things have been higher priority. thanks -- PMM
