Il 12/03/2014 21:01, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
On 12 March 2014 19:41, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote:
Ew. No. It would be easier to just implement setend, even if badly.
Agreed.
For my part, the endian-aware load/store opcodes I alluded to last
August are now in.
Yes, it would be fairly straightforward to implement setend now.
I haven't actually looked at it, though, because the only thing that
uses it is this raspi memcmp code, and there's a workaround
for that. So other things have been higher priority.
I looked at that yesterday and it took me exactly one hour... I'll
submit it for 2.1 since I'm interested (for non-work reasons) in
Raspberry Pi emulation.
Paolo
