Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:

> Il 12/03/2014 18:00, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>> +    } else if (!runstate_check(RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH)
>> +            && !runstate_check(RUN_STATE_PAUSED)) { /* HACK */
>
> Why not "if (runstate_is_running())"?

The predicate actually wanted here is "monitor command 'cont' required
to get the guest running", because 'cont' is where the protection is.
My run state test is a crude approximation.

Reply via email to