Il 13/03/2014 14:18, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> Il 12/03/2014 18:00, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>>> + } else if (!runstate_check(RUN_STATE_PRELAUNCH)
>>> + && !runstate_check(RUN_STATE_PAUSED)) { /* HACK */
>>
>> Why not "if (runstate_is_running())"?
>
> The predicate actually wanted here is "monitor command 'cont' required
> to get the guest running", because 'cont' is where the protection is.
> My run state test is a crude approximation.
>
Got it. Then you need to add at least a check for
"runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE)", otherwise you break incoming
migration. Actually, I think only SAVE_VM/RESTORE_VM/DEBUG are
problematic, but I understand why you preferred a conservative
test (sufficient condition, not necessary).
You are singling out prelaunch and inmigrate because drive_init
will reset autostart to 0 for an encrypted image, right?
Paolo
