On 01/20/2010 02:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
To be honest all possible naming schemes for '-cpu<name>' are just as unfriendly as each other. The only user friendly option is '-cpu host'.IMHO, we should just pick a concise naming scheme& document it. Given they are all equally unfriendly, the one that has consistency with vmware naming seems like a mild winner.
IIUC, VMware uses "Group A, Group B", etc. which is pretty close to saying Family 10h IMHO.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
Daniel
