On 06/16/2014 09:46 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/06/2014 17:39, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto:
>> > No, this is a (backwards-compatible) extension to how the option is
>> parsed.
>>
>> But numa started appearing on query-command-line-options only after this
>> patch got applied. It is not the semantics I would expect from
>> query-command-line-options, but it is a hint that we have a QEMU version
>> with the new numa option handling code.
> 
> Oh, then indeed it's possible.  I had forgotten that -numa was using ad
> hoc parsing code, not QemuOpts.

Then we have our witness, even without waiting for introspection :)

> 
>>> > I suppose with QAPI introspection you could check if the QAPI type
>>> for -numa
>>> > is defined...
>> Does this exist, or is it just an idea?
> 
> Amos was working on it.

Although given that soft freeze is tomorrow, it looks very unlikely that
we'll have it in 2.1.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to