On 07/08/2014 09:13 AM, Al Viro wrote: > Frankly, I suspect that it's better to have qemu-system-alpha behave like > the actual hardware does (including "FPCR.DNOD can't be set") and keep the > linux-user behaviour as is, for somebody brave and masochistic enough to > fight that one. And no, it's nowhere near "just let denorms ride through > the normal softfloat code and play a bit with the flags it might raise". > And then there's netbsd/alpha and openbsd/alpha, so in theory somebody might > want to play with their software completion semantics (not identical to Linux > one) for the sake of yet-to-be-written bsd-user alpha support...
You're probably right there. I've pushed a couple more patches to the branch, split out from your patch here. I believe I've got it all, and havn't mucked things up in the process. I'll run some tests later today when I've got time. r~
