On 07/08/2014 01:20 PM, Al Viro wrote: > Aha... So you've caught that one already... I've looked at your branch; > AFAICS, the only thing missing there is treating stores to FPCR.DNOD in > system mode as "not implemented" (which it is in the code as well as in > 21[0-3]64 hardware).
Is it loaded and stored on 21264, or it is read-as-zero/write-ignore? Is UNDZ not required to be paired with DNOD? r~
