Il 18/07/2014 10:48, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
>
> It is easy to find out if the "fix" is related to 1 or 2/3: just write
>
> if (cpu->kvm_vcpu_dirty) {
> printf ("do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state_always: look at 2/3\n");
> kvm_arch_get_registers(cpu);
> } else {
> printf ("do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state_always: look at 1\n");
> }
>
> To further refine between 2 and 3, I suppose you can set a breakpoint on
> cpu_synchronize_all_states and kvm_cpu_exec, and see which is called
> first after cpu_synchronize_all_states_always.
Marcin, have you ever gotten round to doing this?
Paolo
