Stefan Weil schrieb:
> Stefan Weil schrieb:
>   
>> Compilation of m68k-softmmu or m68k-linux-user on arm host
>> (or cross compilation for arm) results in a linker warning:
>>
>> LINK m68k-softmmu/qemu-system-m68k
>> m68k-dis.o: warning: definition of `floatformat_ieee_single_little'
>> overriding common
>> arm-dis.o: warning: common is here
>> /usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabi/4.3.2/../../../../arm-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld:
>> Warning: size of symbol `floatformat_ieee_single_little' changed from
>> 4 in arm-dis.o to 48 in m68k-dis.o
>>
>> floatformat_ieee_single_little is declared in arm-dis.c and m68k-dis.c,
>> and both declarations don't match, so this is an error.
>>
>> The symbol is not needed in arm-dis.c, so I removed it there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de>
>> ---
>> arm-dis.c | 8 ++------
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arm-dis.c b/arm-dis.c
>> index 2c67d8f..4fb899e 100644
>> --- a/arm-dis.c
>> +++ b/arm-dis.c
>> @@ -60,10 +60,8 @@
>> #define FPU_VFP_EXT_V3 0
>> #define FPU_NEON_EXT_V1 0
>>
>> -int floatformat_ieee_single_little;
>> /* Assume host uses ieee float. */
>> -static void floatformat_to_double (int *ignored, unsigned char *data,
>> - double *dest)
>> +static void floatformat_to_double (unsigned char *data, double *dest)
>> {
>> union {
>> uint32_t i;
>> @@ -2543,9 +2541,7 @@ print_insn_neon (struct disassemble_info *info,
>> long given, bfd_boolean thumb)
>> valbytes[2] = (value >> 16) & 0xff;
>> valbytes[3] = (value >> 24) & 0xff;
>>
>> - floatformat_to_double
>> - (&floatformat_ieee_single_little, valbytes,
>> - &fvalue);
>> + floatformat_to_double (valbytes, &fvalue);
>>
>> func (stream, "#%.7g\t; 0x%.8lx", fvalue,
>> value);
>>     
>
> The patch is still missing in git. Maybe it got lost?
>
> A linker warning about symbols which change from 4 to 48 byte
> should be regarded as error.
>
> Regards,
> Stefan Weil
>   

I'd commit it myself if I had the rights, but I haven't.
So the only think I can do is remind those who have...

Regards,
Stefan



Reply via email to