Zhu Guihua <zhugh.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> writes: > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 10:01 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 08/10/2014 05:49, Zhu Guihua ha scritto: >> > when device_add pc-dimm, only 'memdev' property is necessary, but the >> > 'id' property is optional. >> > >> > So I execute the command as followings: >> > object_add memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=128M >> > device_add pc-dimm,memdev=ram0 >> > >> > Now it is impossible to delete the pc-dimm, because it has no id, and it >> > is inside of 'peripheral-anon' container. >> >> Sure; but that was an explicit choice when you issued device_add. > > Thanks for your patient explanation。 > And I think it is better to make memory-devices without dev->id use > auto-generated IDs.
Auto-generated IDs have been discussed and rejected several times. At the very least, clashes with user-specified IDs must be impossible.
