On 21 January 2015 at 08:40, Thomas Huth <th...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > IMHO it might be better to add a proper #ifdef guard around that > function. Consider that the calls to end_exclusive() might get removed > completely one day, then you won't get a compiler warning about the > unused function anymore if you used the attribute__((unused)) way.
Too painful, and these functions are likely going to go away/change with the multithreaded-system-emulation support (I hope). -- PMM
