On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 06:51:16PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:47:03 +0100 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > This seems to change the contents of the tables in too many ways. So of > > it needs changing since PCI are somewhat broken by your recent patch. > In which way is it broken?
Try make check and look at the diffs. They shouldn't be so big. I want differences to be trivial, e.g. 0->Zero would be ok. Refactoring code generation should be separate from changing generated code. > > > > So let's do this: please prepare a minimal patchset that just generates > > PCI description dynamically. Drop everything that's not necessary, and > > verify that make check produces trivial diffs only. > > > > We'll go from there. > >