On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 06:51:16PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:47:03 +0100
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > This seems to change the contents of the tables in too many ways.  So of
> > it needs changing since PCI are somewhat broken by your recent patch.
> In which way is it broken?

Try make check and look at the diffs.
They shouldn't be so big.
I want differences to be trivial, e.g.
0->Zero would be ok.
Refactoring code generation should be separate from
changing generated code.


> > 
> > So let's do this: please prepare a minimal patchset that just generates
> > PCI description dynamically.  Drop everything that's not necessary, and
> > verify that make check produces trivial diffs only.
> > 
> > We'll go from there.
> > 

Reply via email to