On 23/03/2015 16:26, Peter Maydell wrote: > > True. But since it's not a new API we can keep the old name for the > > simple one. > > ...except that means that the function you should in > general not be using as default is the one with the short > name, which is the wrong way round. We should be guiding > people writing new code to think about the required > behaviour on memory transaction failure (and attributes) > as they write the code, not making it easy for them to > ignore the issue...
Not necessarily, for example PCI devices can certainly use the short name. Paolo
