Am 24.03.2015 um 21:03 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> From: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
>
> In the near term, we will use it for a sensible-looking
> 'gen':false inside command declarations, instead of the
> current ugly 'gen':'no'.
>
> In the long term, it will allow conversion from shorthand
> with defaults mentioned only in side-band documentation:
> 'data':{'*flag':'bool', '*string':'str'}
> into an explicit default value documentation, as in:
> 'data':{'flag':{'type':'bool', 'optional':true, 'default':true},
> 'string':{'type':'str', 'optional':true, 'default':null}}
FWIW, I don't think that's a very friendly syntax for humans, it's a bit
verbose. But that's no reason not to allow true/false/null, of course.
> We still don't parse integer values (also necessary before
> we can allow explicit defaults), but that can come in a later
> series.
>
> Update the testsuite to match an improved error message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Kevin
