Michael S. Tsirkin schrieb: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:44:06PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote: > >> To emulate hardware without an EEPROM, >> EEPROM_SIZE may be set to 0. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de> >> --- >> hw/eepro100.c | 2 ++ >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/eepro100.c b/hw/eepro100.c >> index cedc427..e12ee23 100644 >> --- a/hw/eepro100.c >> +++ b/hw/eepro100.c >> @@ -1866,9 +1866,11 @@ static int e100_nic_init(PCIDevice *pci_dev) >> >> e100_pci_reset(s, e100_device); >> >> +#if EEPROM_SIZE > 0 >> /* Add 64 * 2 EEPROM. i82557 and i82558 support a 64 word EEPROM, >> * i82559 and later support 64 or 256 word EEPROM. */ >> s->eeprom = eeprom93xx_new(EEPROM_SIZE); >> +#endif >> > > I expect long-term EEPROM_SIZE will stop being a compile-time > constant then? > > EEPROM_SIZE might be a qdev parameter, so a new eeprom_size would become part of the device status.
Up to now, there was no need for it. >> >> /* Handler for memory-mapped I/O */ >> s->mmio_index = >> -- >> 1.7.0 >>