Michael S. Tsirkin schrieb:
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:44:02PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
>   
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de>
>> ---
>>  hw/eepro100.c |    9 +++++----
>>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/eepro100.c b/hw/eepro100.c
>> index 0415132..741031c 100644
>> --- a/hw/eepro100.c
>> +++ b/hw/eepro100.c
>> @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ typedef enum {
>>  } scb_command_bit;
>>  
>>  typedef enum {
>> +    STATUS_NOT_OK = 0,
>>      STATUS_C = BIT(15),
>>      STATUS_OK = BIT(13),
>>  } scb_status_bit;
>>     
>
> 0 is not a bit, I would just use 0 as a constant below.
>   

In a philosophical way, not a bit is some kind of a bit.

I think ok_status = STATUS_NOT_OK is clearer than
ok_status = 0.

>   
>> @@ -882,7 +883,7 @@ static void action_command(EEPRO100State *s)
>>          bool bit_s;
>>          bool bit_i;
>>          bool bit_nc;
>> -        bool success = true;
>> +        uint16_t ok_status = STATUS_OK;
>>          s->cb_address = s->cu_base + s->cu_offset;
>>          read_cb(s);
>>          bit_el = ((s->tx.command & COMMAND_EL) != 0);
>> @@ -915,7 +916,7 @@ static void action_command(EEPRO100State *s)
>>          case CmdTx:
>>              if (bit_nc) {
>>                  missing("CmdTx: NC = 0");
>> -                success = false;
>> +                ok_status = STATUS_NOT_OK;
>>                  break;
>>              }
>>              tx_command(s);
>> @@ -932,11 +933,11 @@ static void action_command(EEPRO100State *s)
>>              break;
>>          default:
>>              missing("undefined command");
>> -            success = false;
>> +            ok_status = STATUS_NOT_OK;
>>              break;
>>          }
>>          /* Write new status. */
>> -        stw_phys(s->cb_address, s->tx.status | STATUS_C | (success ? 
>> STATUS_OK : 0));
>> +        stw_phys(s->cb_address, s->tx.status | ok_status | STATUS_C);
>>          if (bit_i) {
>>              /* CU completed action. */
>>              eepro100_cx_interrupt(s);
>> -- 
>> 1.7.0
>>     



Reply via email to