On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 06:09:56PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote: > Michael S. Tsirkin schrieb: > > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:44:00PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote: > > > >> These patches fix two regressions (1, 9) which made eepro100 rather > >> useless, > >> use a simple method to handle the different device variants (2), > >> add a new device variant (4) and fix or clean some smaller issues. > >> > >> [PATCH 1/9] eepro100: Don't allow writing SCBStatus > >> [PATCH 2/9] eepro100: Simplify status handling > >> [PATCH 3/9] eepro100: Simplified device instantiation > >> [PATCH 4/9] eepro100: Add new device variant i82801 > >> [PATCH 5/9] eepro100: Set configuration bit for standard TCB > >> [PATCH 6/9] eepro100: Support compilation without EEPROM > >> [PATCH 7/9] eepro100: Set power management capability using > >> pci_reserve_capability > >> [PATCH 8/9] eepro100: Fix mapping of flash memory > >> [PATCH 9/9] eepro100: Fix PCI interrupt pin configuration regression > >> > >> Regards, > >> Stefan > >> > > > > I've applied these on my tree with some minor tweaks. > > Could you please let me know whether the result looks > > sane to you? > > > > Thanks! > > > > I noticed minor tweaks in patches 2 and 8, both ok. > > Regards > Stefan
OK, I added an API to add a capability at a known offset, eepro100 code becomes simpler if we use it. Can you review and ack please? -- MST
