Referring to "type" as both a meta-type (built-in, enum, union, alternate, or struct) and a specific type (the name that the schema uses for declaring structs) is confusing. Finish up the conversion to using "struct" in qapi schema by removing the hack in the generator that allowed 'type'.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> --- v7: split from the previous patch --- scripts/qapi.py | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/qapi.py b/scripts/qapi.py index ff337c2..ff53360 100644 --- a/scripts/qapi.py +++ b/scripts/qapi.py @@ -617,20 +617,6 @@ def parse_schema(input_file): for expr_elem in schema.exprs: expr = expr_elem['expr'] info = expr_elem['info'] - - # back-compat hack until all schemas have been converted; - # preserve the ordering of the original expression - if expr.has_key('type'): - seen_type = False - for (key, value) in expr.items(): - if key == 'type': - seen_type = True - del expr['type'] - expr['struct'] = value - elif seen_type: - del expr[key] - expr[key] = value - if expr.has_key('enum'): check_keys(expr_elem, 'enum', ['data']) add_enum(expr['enum'], info, expr['data']) -- 2.1.0