Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes: > Referring to "type" as both a meta-type (built-in, enum, union, > alternate, or struct) and a specific type (the name that the > schema uses for declaring structs) is confusing. The confusion > is only made worse by the fact that the generator mostly already > refers to struct even when dealing with expr['type']. This > commit changes the generator to consistently refer to it as > struct everywhere, plus a single back-compat tweak that allows > accepting the existing .json files as-is, so that the meat of > this change is separate from the mindless churn of that change. > > Fix the testsuite fallout for error messages that change, and > in some cases, become more legible. Improve comments to better > match our intentions where a struct (rather than any complex > type) is required. Note that in some cases, an error message > now refers to 'struct' while the schema still refers to 'type'; > that will be cleaned up in the later commit to the schema. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
