Am 14.09.2015 um 16:36 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Wen Congyang <we...@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
> > diff --git a/qmp-commands.hx b/qmp-commands.hx
> > index 495670b..139a23b 100644
> > --- a/qmp-commands.hx
> > +++ b/qmp-commands.hx
> > @@ -4053,6 +4053,59 @@ Example:
> >  EQMP
> >  
> >      {
> > +        .name       = "x-child-add",
> > +        .args_type  = "parent:B,child:B",
> > +        .mhandler.cmd_new = qmp_marshal_input_x_child_add,
> > +    },
> > +
> > +SQMP
> > +x-child-add
> > +------------
> > +
> > +Add a child to a quorum node.
> > +
> > +Arguments:
> > +
> > +- "parent": the quorum's id or node name
> > +- "child": the child node-name which will be added
> 
> Node name parameters are usually named node-name or, if there's more
> than one, FOO-node-name.  Unless we want to abandon that convention,
> this should therefore be node-name and child-node-name, or parent-node
> name and child-node-name.

Didn't we come to the conclusion that foo-node-name is redundant and
should just be foo, leaving things like node-name only for cases where
there is no foo?

Kevin

Reply via email to