On 16/09/2015 13:27, Claudio Fontana wrote: >> > See my answer to Paolo: >> > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-07/msg05341.html > Sorry for not noticing the previous discussion.. > > Still it would seem more sensible to say explicitly how big the field is I > think, > especially if we want to make it possible to have independent server > implementations of this...
There was another question that went unanswered: > Does anyone care about ivshmem on 32-bit hosts? And I might even double down with "does anyone care about ivshmem on big-endian hosts?" Just defining the protocol to be "64-bit little-endian" would be nice, even if it would break those 2 people that respectively used ivshmem on 32-bit Intel and big-endian PPC. (And maybe also the one guy who used it on 32-bit big-endian PPC!). Paolo
