> (I'm not sure what happens to your emails that all of them does not > relate to the same thread/Message-ID, making a pain to follow through > out the volume of email on the list, please pay attention to that)
I just click Reply All, I'm not sure how else I would do it. Are they somehow being posted as new top level threads instead of replies? > I'm not particularly against any improvement like configuration files or > more command line args, but I'm concerned about the security itself. If > some guest can scape to the host, it's gonna be much easier to whitelist > syscalls for the next guests, changing the command line is a little too > obvious -- paranoid example, I know. Any config would be used only for syscalls which are already whitelisted by the default qemu-seccomp.c For example changing the config could be used to allow ioctls only on certain file descriptors, since ioctl is already whitelisted, but it could not be used to whiteilst something which is not already whitelisted, such as the personality system call. > If you want to write an RFC with your idea, you're more than welcome. We > could move on this discussion and perhaps come up with a nice solution. I've never attempted that before. Could you point me in the right direction?
