Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> writes:
> scanf calls must not use PRI constants, they have probably the wrong size and
> corrupt memory. We could replace them by SCN ones, but strtol is simpler than
> scanf here anyway. While at it, also fix the parsers to reject garbage after
> the number ("4096xyz" was accepted before).Do we have more misuse of PRI with scanf elsewhere? No need to fix them all in one commit (and thus delay this fix); I just want to make sure somebody looks.
