Am 26.05.2010 13:13, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> scanf calls must not use PRI constants, they have probably the wrong size and
>> corrupt memory. We could replace them by SCN ones, but strtol is simpler than
>> scanf here anyway. While at it, also fix the parsers to reject garbage after
>> the number ("4096xyz" was accepted before).
>
> Do we have more misuse of PRI with scanf elsewhere? No need to fix them
> all in one commit (and thus delay this fix); I just want to make sure
> somebody looks.
I saw another one in some Xen file that Gerd should fix some time. I'm
not aware of any other.
Kevin
