On 01/08/2016 08:25 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > To do so, we'd need to first emit the insn_start and then after translating > the > given target-insn, update the insn_start parameters with the decoded insn > details.
Fair enough. > Any thoughts on this approach? Or ideas on better options to achieve this? This looks like a nice cleanup already. Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> r~
