Edgar E Iglesias writes: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 01:12:29PM +0100, Lluís Vilanova wrote: >> Peter Maydell writes: >> >> > On 11 January 2016 at 20:16, Lluís Vilanova <vilan...@ac.upc.edu> wrote: >> >> Great! I implemented a similar thing long time ago. In my case the >> >> machinery is >> >> completely hidden under the concept of "value promises" in TCG (i.e., the >> >> user >> >> does not need to know about TCG internals like tcg_op_buf_count): >> >> >> >> // create promise >> >> TCGv_promise_i32 imm_p; >> >> TCGv_i32 imm = tcg_const_promise_i32(&imm_p); // akin to tcg_const_i32() >> >> ... >> >> // operate with promised immediate 'imm' >> >> ... >> >> // resolve promised value >> >> tcg_set_promise_i32(imm_p, resolved_value); >> >> > I think this is definitely a nicer API if we're going to >> > have more than a very few uses -- gen_icount kind of gets >> > away with looking under the hood of the tcg data structures >> > because it's a sort of internal thing itself, but wider >> > use would definitely benefit from a more formal API. >> >> If this is not time-critical, I can prepare an updated patch by Friday, or >> let >> Edgar do it. Both are fine by me.
> It would be awesome if you could rebase your series. Ok, then I'll rebase it on Friday. Cheers, Lluis
