Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> writes: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 04:41:41PM +0000, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > The GThread coroutine backend was a portable coroutine implementation. >> > Over the years all platforms got their own optimized coroutine >> > implementations and nothing uses the GThread backend anymore. >> > >> > In fact, ./configure mentions the GThread backend doesn't work but might >> > be useful for debugging. Since GDB macros were added to ease debugging >> > of ucontext coroutines, there seems little point in keeping a broken >> > backend around. >> >> Except I found that I couldn't run the ThreadSanitizer without using the >> gthread co-routines. So while I totally agree we should dump stuff >> that's not used lets make sure no one else relies on it for debugging >> stuff as well. > > Is it still the case that ThreadSanitizer only works with gthread > coroutines?
It certainly was very confused about what was going on with the default option (sigucontext IIRC?). > > Stefan -- Alex Bennée
