Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 06/16/2010 11:17 AM, Juan Quintela wrote: > >Consider the example that I showed you: > > > >(host A) (host B) > >launch qemu launch qemu -incoming > >migrate host B > > ..... > > do your things > > exit/poweroff/... > > > >At this point you have a qemu launched on machine A, with nothing on > >machine B. running "cont" on machine A, have disastreus consecuences, > >and there is no way to prevent it :( > > > > If there was a reasonable belief that it wouldn't result in disaster, I > would fully support you. However, I can't think of any rational reason > why someone would do this. I can't think of a better analogy to > shooting yourself in the foot.
That looks like a useful way to fork a guest for testing, if host B is launched with -snapshot, or a copy of the disk image, or a qcow2 child of it. Does it work? :-) -- Jamie
