On 07/15/2016 03:46 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Renames look like this with git-diff(1) when diff.renames = true is set:
> 
>   diff --git a/a b/b
>   similarity index 100%
>   rename from a
>   rename to b
> 
> This raises the "Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch"
> error because checkpatch.pl only considers a diff valid if it contains
> at least one "@@" hunk.
> 
> This patch accepts renames and copies too so that checkpatch.pl exits
> successfully when a diff only renames/copies files.  The git diff
> extended header format is described on the git-diff(1) man page.
> 
> Reported-by: Colin Lord <cl...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>

and especially nice since we recommend diff.renames = true in our patch
submission guidelines.


-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to