On 18/07/2016 14:15, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:46:54AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> Renames look like this with git-diff(1) when diff.renames = true is set:
>>
>>   diff --git a/a b/b
>>   similarity index 100%
>>   rename from a
>>   rename to b
>>
>> This raises the "Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch"
>> error because checkpatch.pl only considers a diff valid if it contains
>> at least one "@@" hunk.
>>
>> This patch accepts renames and copies too so that checkpatch.pl exits
>> successfully when a diff only renames/copies files.  The git diff
>> extended header format is described on the git-diff(1) man page.
>>
>> Reported-by: Colin Lord <cl...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> There is no maintainer for checkpatch.pl, so...
> 
> Thanks, applied to my block tree:
> https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block

Actually I've sent a pull request for this patch too this morning
(forgot to sent the "applied" message because at the time I applied it I
was offline), but Peter bumped it.

Paolo

Reply via email to