On 09/20/16 20:23, Thorsten Kohfeldt wrote: > > Am 20.09.2016 um 02:51 schrieb Laszlo Ersek:
>> I think it would make sense to work from the pre-rendered FlatView, >> if the information you can get out of it covers your needs. > > I assume you know by now that I do _not_ feel that it covers my needs. Okay. I guess you've made your point convincingly enough (although I'm just an interested bystander in this thread). I think the patch has a very low chance for regressions and it shouldn't draw in a big maintenance burden, so it could be considered "pure improvement" as-is. I'm not volunteering to do a full review. One thing I notice though is that the constification of memory_region_size()'s sole parameter could be / should be moved into a separate, "prep" patch. (I propose you wait for further feedback before reposting just with this change.) Thanks Laszlo
