> - changed PATH_MAX to 128 in sysfs() patch (last remaining item > that was supposed to be in the previous version)
At first glance of the patch, you didn't change the good PATH_MAX... Laurent It slipped through the cracks. Sorry. :( My bad. But all other changes are in. Rebase is also good, this series sits *after* 26-patch linux-user change. Speaking about PATH_MAX, I intended to replace it with hardcoded 128. However, another possibility is replacing it with NAME_MAX (255). Or to leave PATH_MAX (4096)? Or something else altogether? What do you think? Thanks, Aleksandar
