On (Fri) 30 Sep 2016 [14:27:26], Hailiang Zhang wrote:
> On 2016/9/30 13:53, Amit Shah wrote:
> >In the meanwhile, can you check why the autobuilder fails to compile
> >with your patchset?
> >
>
> Yes, It was related to the 9th patch, where i used %lu to print value of
> 'uint64_t' type
> which is incorrect. I think it can be fixed by use 'PRIu64' to print uint64_t
> value.
>
> The wrong codes are:
> + if (total_size != value) {
> + error_report("Got %lu VMState data, less than expected %lu",
> + total_size, value);
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> Fixed:
> + if (total_size != value) {
> + error_report("Got%" PRIu64 " VMState data, less than expected %"
> PRIu64,
> + total_size, value);
> + goto out;
> + }
>
>
> Should i resend this series with this be fixed now ?
It's easier if you resend, that way it reduces the maintainer's burden
and makes reviewing/applying patches faster!
Amit
