Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com> writes: > On (Fri) Aug 27 2010 [07:39:37], Anthony Liguori wrote: >> > >> >NACK. It has always been allowed& valid to call query-balloon >> >to get the current balloon level. We must not throw an error >> >just because the recently added mem stats can't be refreshed. >> >> I think that's a fair comment but why even bother fixing the >> command. Let's introduce a new command that just gets a single >> piece of information instead of having a command return lots of >> information. > > Instead, let's have query-balloon do the same thing as it did in 0.12 > and add a new command for 0.13 (query-balloon-stats) that does the stats > with timeout? > > That way we won't have regressions from 0.12 and have the new behaviour > only for 0.13, which we can say is 'experimental'.
Sounds sensible to me. Not too late for fixing 0.13? Anthony?
