On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:48:51 +0200 Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> writes: > > [...] > > My position is that we aren't any closer to having compatible APIs > > then we were with the human monitor. I think we need to focus on > > compatibility and that that has to be solved as the QEMU interface > > level. I contend that it's not solvable at the QMP level. > > We've argued from day 0 every step along the way. And here we are, one > year later, still arguing about the very basics. > > There's a fundamental disagreement. I want to keep QMP the way it was > designed: supporting compatible evolution. You want to remake it from > the ground up as RPC to internal C interfaces. > > It seems exceedingly unlikely to me that we can agree on the wisdom of > such a remake. We can repeat and elaborate on our arguments for a > while, but let's face it: we want different things. Yes, that's the fundamental problem here. > I'm afraid I can't build you the thing you want. The best I can offer > is to step out of the way and let you build it. >
