Am 24.10.2016 um 16:44 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > On 24/10/2016 15:47, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > One effect that makes me less than fully happy is that 'git log > > block/raw.c' without --follow mixes the history of the renamed driver > > with the history of the old, differently licensed one. On the other > > hand, the removal of the old driver happened three years ago, so it's > > probably unlikely that people confuse what belongs to which one and > > revive old code accidentally. > > Hmm, this makes it sensible to only apply patch 2, especially since Eric > has corteously split them. :)
Maybe rename to something like raw-format.c instead then in patch 1? I must admit that it's reasonable enough to make the assumption that raw_bsd.c has something to do with a BSD-specific block driver. Kevin