On 19/12/2016 17:24, Vincent Palatin wrote:
>  #else /* _WIN32 */
> -    abort();
> +    if (!qemu_cpu_is_self(cpu)) {
> +        CONTEXT context;
> +        if (SuspendThread(cpu->hThread) == (DWORD)(-1)) {
> +            fprintf(stderr, "qemu:%s: GetLastError:%lu\n", __func__,
> +                    GetLastError());
> +            exit(1);
> +        }
> +
> +        /* On multi-core systems, we are not sure that the thread is actually
> +         * suspended until we can get the context.
> +         */
> +        context.ContextFlags = CONTEXT_CONTROL;
> +        while (GetThreadContext(cpu->hThread, &context) != 0) {
> +            continue;
> +        }
> +
> +        if (hax_enabled()) {
> +            cpu->exit_request = 1;
> +        }

As mentioned in the reply to patch 4, please leave the cpu->exit_request
= 1 assignment to the caller.

Apart from the above change, can you check if there are some less
heavyeight methods to force an exit?  I can think of QueueUserAPC with
an empty pfnAPC here, and SleepEx(0, TRUE) in qemu_hax_cpu_thread_fn
before qemu_wait_io_event_common.

> +        if (ResumeThread(cpu->hThread) == (DWORD)(-1)) {
> +            fprintf(stderr, "qemu:%s: GetLastError:%lu\n", __func__,
> +                    GetLastError());
> +            exit(1);
> +        }
> +    }

[...]

> 
> +            /*
> +             * In Hax, the qemu allocate the virtual address, and HAX kernel
> +             * populate the memory with physical memory. Currently we have no
> +             * paging, so user should make sure enough free memory in advance
> +             */
> +            if (hax_enabled()) {
> +                int ret;
> +                ret = hax_populate_ram((uint64_t)(uintptr_t)new_block->host,
> +                                       new_block->max_length);
> +                if (ret < 0) {
> +                    error_setg(errp, "Hax failed to populate ram");
> +                    return;
> +                }
> +            }
> +

Can you check if the interface at
http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=148225154320642&q=raw would be good for
your purposes, and if so include that patch in your v6?

Otherwise looks great, so I'm confident we can add this in QEMU 2.9.

Paolo

Reply via email to