* Samuel Thibault (samuel.thiba...@gnu.org) wrote: > Dr. David Alan Gilbert, on mar. 28 févr. 2017 17:09:26 +0000, wrote: > > but only for Linux. > > That's what I was referring to.
Yes I think that's OK because: a) The alternative breaks all backwards migration b) This doesn't casuse any problem for forward migration There is another way, we could add a subsection that's sent whenever we use non-IPv4; that would (probably) fail noisily on a backwards migration to an old setup. But IMHO it's not worth it in this case given how rare a backwards migration of an IPv6 slirp connection on something other than Linux is. Dave > Samuel -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
