On 3 March 2017 at 15:55, G 3 <programmingk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here is the patch. I think we should let Mark or some else test it to see if
> it does fix the problem before a real patch is submitted.
>
> ---
> hw/9pfs/9p-util.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
We can't take any patch without a Signed-off-by: line, not
even a three line one.
>
> diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> index 091f3ce..254d2a9 100644
> --- a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
> #ifndef QEMU_9P_UTIL_H
> #define QEMU_9P_UTIL_H
>
> +#ifndef O_PATH
> + #define O_PATH 0
> +#endif
Could use a comment explaining why it's OK to define it in
a way that means it's a no-op on hosts without it.
> +
> static inline void close_preserve_errno(int fd)
> {
> int serrno = errno;
> --
> 2.10.2
thanks
-- PMM
