On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 15:58:13 +0000
Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 3 March 2017 at 15:55, G 3 <programmingk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here is the patch. I think we should let Mark or some else test it to see if
> > it does fix the problem before a real patch is submitted.
> >
> > ---
> >  hw/9pfs/9p-util.h | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)  
> 
> We can't take any patch without a Signed-off-by: line, not
> even a three line one.
> 
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> > index 091f3ce..254d2a9 100644
> > --- a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> > +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> > @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@
> >  #ifndef QEMU_9P_UTIL_H
> >  #define QEMU_9P_UTIL_H
> >
> > +#ifndef O_PATH
> > +    #define O_PATH 0
> > +#endif  
> 
> Could use a comment explaining why it's OK to define it in
> a way that means it's a no-op on hosts without it.
> 

Right. I'll send a patch with an appropriate comment then.

> > +
> >  static inline void close_preserve_errno(int fd)
> >  {
> >      int serrno = errno;
> > --
> > 2.10.2  
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM

Attachment: pgp4MROdzv9qO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to