On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 16:53:44 +0800 Cao jin <caoj.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On 04/06/2017 06:36 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:19:10PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > >> On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 00:50:22 +0300 > >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 01:38:22PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > >>>> The previous intention of trying to handle all sorts of AER faults > >>>> clearly had more value, though even there the implementation and > >>>> configuration requirements restricted the practicality. For instance > >>>> is AER support actually useful to a customer if it requires all ports > >>>> of a multifunction device assigned to the VM? This seems more like a > >>>> feature targeting whole system partitioning rather than general VM > >>>> device assignment use cases. Maybe that's ok, but it should be a clear > >>>> design decision. > >>> > >>> Alex, what kind of testing do you expect to be necessary? > >>> Would you say testing on real hardware and making it trigger > >>> AER errors is a requirement? > >> > >> Testing various fatal, non-fatal, and corrected errors with aer-inject, > >> especially in multfunction configurations (where more than one port > >> is actually usable) would certainly be required. If we have cases where > >> the driver for a companion function can escalate a non-fatal error to a > >> bus reset, that should be tested, even if it requires temporary hacks to > >> the host driver for the companion function to trigger that case. AER > >> handling is not something that the typical user is going to experience, > >> so it should to be thoroughly tested to make sure it works when needed > >> or there's little point to doing it at all. Thanks, > >> > >> Alex > > > > Some things can be tested within a VM. What would you > > say would be sufficient on a VM and what has to be > > tested on bare metal? > > > > Does the "bare metal" here mean something like XenServer? No, bare metal means the non-virtualized host OS. I think Michael was trying to facilitate testing by proposing to do it in a VM such that we can create strange and interesting topologies that aren't bound by a system in a remote lab having only one NIC port connected. Thanks, Alex
