On 2017-05-22 20:02, Richard Henderson wrote: > Previously, helper_ex would construct the insn and then implement > the insn via direct calls other helpers. This was sufficient to > boot Linux but that is all. > > It is easy enough to go the whole nine yards by stashing state for > EXECUTE within the cpu, and then relying on a new TB to be created > that properly and completely interprets the insn. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> > --- > target/s390x/cpu.h | 4 +- > target/s390x/helper.h | 2 +- > target/s390x/insn-data.def | 4 +- > target/s390x/machine.c | 19 +++++++ > target/s390x/mem_helper.c | 136 > +++++++++++---------------------------------- > target/s390x/translate.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 6 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
This looks good on the principle, and finally removes a big hack. That said it prevent my test system to boot. I haven't investigated why yet. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
