On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 10:26 PM, sundeep subbaraya <sundeep.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alistair, > > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 5:30 AM, Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Subbaraya Sundeep >> <sundeep.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Emulated Emcraft's Smartfusion2 System On Module starter >> > kit. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sundeep.l...@gmail.com> >> > --- >> > hw/arm/Makefile.objs | 1 + >> > hw/arm/msf2-som.c | 89 >> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > 2 files changed, 90 insertions(+) >> > create mode 100644 hw/arm/msf2-som.c >> > >> > diff --git a/hw/arm/Makefile.objs b/hw/arm/Makefile.objs >> > index c828061..4b02093 100644 >> > --- a/hw/arm/Makefile.objs >> > +++ b/hw/arm/Makefile.objs >> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ obj-y += omap_sx1.o palm.o realview.o spitz.o >> > stellaris.o >> > obj-y += tosa.o versatilepb.o vexpress.o virt.o xilinx_zynq.o z2.o >> > obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += virt-acpi-build.o >> > obj-y += netduino2.o >> > +obj-y += msf2-som.o >> >> This should be obj-$(CONFIG_MSF2). > > > Ok will change it. >> >> >> > obj-y += sysbus-fdt.o >> > >> > obj-y += armv7m.o exynos4210.o pxa2xx.o pxa2xx_gpio.o pxa2xx_pic.o >> > diff --git a/hw/arm/msf2-som.c b/hw/arm/msf2-som.c >> > new file mode 100644 >> > index 0000000..cd2b759 >> > --- /dev/null >> > +++ b/hw/arm/msf2-som.c >> > @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ >> > +/* >> > + * SmartFusion2 SOM starter kit(from Emcraft) emulation. >> > + * >> > + * Copyright (c) 2017 Subbaraya Sundeep <sundeep.l...@gmail.com> >> > + * >> > + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person >> > obtaining a copy >> > + * of this software and associated documentation files (the >> > "Software"), to deal >> > + * in the Software without restriction, including without limitation >> > the rights >> > + * to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or >> > sell >> > + * copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software >> > is >> > + * furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: >> > + * >> > + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be >> > included in >> > + * all copies or substantial portions of the Software. >> > + * >> > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, >> > EXPRESS OR >> > + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF >> > MERCHANTABILITY, >> > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT >> > SHALL >> > + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR >> > OTHER >> > + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, >> > ARISING FROM, >> > + * OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER >> > DEALINGS IN >> > + * THE SOFTWARE. >> > + */ >> > + >> > +#include "qemu/osdep.h" >> > +#include "qapi/error.h" >> > +#include "hw/boards.h" >> > +#include "hw/arm/msf2-soc.h" >> > +#include "hw/arm/arm.h" >> > +#include "exec/address-spaces.h" >> > + >> > +#define DDR_BASE_ADDRESS 0xA0000000 >> > +#define DDR_SIZE (64 * M_BYTE) >> > + >> > +static void emcraft_sf2_init(MachineState *machine) >> > +{ >> > + DeviceState *dev; >> > + DeviceState *spi_flash; >> > + MSF2State *soc; >> > + DriveInfo *dinfo = drive_get_next(IF_MTD); >> > + qemu_irq cs_line; >> > + SSIBus *spi_bus; >> > + MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory(); >> > + MemoryRegion *ddr = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1); >> > + >> > + memory_region_init_ram(ddr, NULL, "ddr-ram", DDR_SIZE, >> > + &error_fatal); >> > + vmstate_register_ram_global(ddr); >> > + memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, DDR_BASE_ADDRESS, ddr); >> >> The user can use -m to specify the amount of RAM to create in the >> machine. Unless this board only ever includes 64MB of RAM you should >> use that option (you will need to sanity check it though). If the >> board only ever has 64MB it might be worth printing a warning to the >> user if they specify an something. Although there might be a default >> if they don't use -m, which makes it hard to print out a warning >> message. > > > This -m confuses me. Why is it necessary for an embedded board? RAM chip > is fixed and not extendable. Whereas normal PC may have extra RAM slots. > If another board has more RAM then we would instantiate another machine for > it > with that RAM size. Please explain. Maybe I am thinking in wrong direction.
I agree with you, it doesn't make sense for every board. For some embedded boards it does make sense (ZynqMP can have a customisable amount of memory) but for most it doesn't make too much sense. In saying that it is a commonly used QEMU option, if you can find a way to report a warning if the user tries to specify a custom amount of memory I think that would be beneficial as QEMU will just ignore their input. I have a feeling that the ram_size variable will be set even if the user doesn't specify anything, which we don't want to report a warning on. Thanks, Alistair > > Thanks, > Sundeep