On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:52:14AM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > The code managing DRCs[0] has quite a few things that are more > complicated than they need to be. In particular the object > representing a DRC has a bunch of method pointers, despite the fact > that there are currently no subclasses, and even if there were the > method implementations would be unlikely to differ.
So you are getting rid of a few methods. How about other methods ? Specially attach and detach which have incorporated all the logic needed to handle logical and physical DRs into their implementations ? Guess these will be follow in subequent parts ? Regards, Bharata.
