On 07/31/17 20:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:16:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> OK. If the proposed solution with the r/o mem base/limit registers is >> rooted in the spec (and I think it indeed must be; apparently this would >> be the same as what we're already planning for IO disablement), then >> that's a strong argument for PciBusDxe to accommodate this probing in >> the platform hook. >> >> Thanks >> Laszlo > > Do you mean making base/limit read-only?
Yes, I do. (Perhaps writing "r/o" was too terse.) Thanks Laszlo
