On 12/09/17 17:41, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:

> The commit message mentions that prior to the conversion some CPU state
> was missing but it doesn't mention anything about dropping existing
> fields as part of the conversion process so I suspect that this was an
> accidental side-effect.

Actually I've clicked send a little too early here since re-reading the
last paragraph of a90db15 I can see the inference here: "Exactly what
needs to be saved in what configurations has been more carefully
examined, too".

Alexey - do you recall from your analysis why these fields were no
longer deemed necessary, and how your TCG tests were configured?


ATB,

Mark.

Reply via email to