On 13/09/17 02:46, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 12/09/17 17:41, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> 
>> The commit message mentions that prior to the conversion some CPU state
>> was missing but it doesn't mention anything about dropping existing
>> fields as part of the conversion process so I suspect that this was an
>> accidental side-effect.
> 
> Actually I've clicked send a little too early here since re-reading the
> last paragraph of a90db15 I can see the inference here: "Exactly what
> needs to be saved in what configurations has been more carefully
> examined, too".
> 
> Alexey - do you recall from your analysis why these fields were no
> longer deemed necessary, and how your TCG tests were configured?

I most certainly did not do analysis (my bad. sorry) - I took the patch
from David as he left the team, fixed to compile and pushed away. I am also
very suspicions we did not try migrating TCG or anything but pseries. My
guest that things did not break (if they did not which I am not sure about,
for the TCG case) because the interrupt controller (XICS) or the
pseries-guest took care of resending an interrupt which does not seem to be
the case for mac99.


-- 
Alexey

Reply via email to