* Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> [2017-10-18 11:53:10 +0200]: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:23:47 +0800 > Dong Jia Shi <bjsdj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > * Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2017-10-17 18:19:20 +0200]: > > > > [...] > > > > > >> Testing > > > >> ======= > > > >> > > > >> Nothing happened since v2 except for a quick smoke test. Dong Jia gave > > > >> v2 > > > >> a spin with a focus on vfio-ccw. @Dong Jia I would appreciate some > > > >> proper > > > >> testing, especially regarding the changes in vfio-ccw (patch #3). > > > > > > > > Looks sane to me (if needed, I can fix up the minor things I found). > > > > > > > > In addition to some testing, I'd appreciate some review from others as > > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > Of course, I'm fine with the fixes (won't answer individually). I think > > > both Dong Jia and Pierre have already put enough work in this to be > > > credited > > > with a tag, so I really hope they will get around to review this. I would > > > be especially happy with an Tested-by: Dong Jia since this series is quite > > > under-tested, and the changes in vfio-ccw aren't just minor. > > > > > > Of course I could come up with a test setup myself, but I hope Dong Jia > > > already has one, and he is certainly more involved with vfio-ccw. > > > > > Using Conny's s390-next branch + this series (#2-#7), I didn't notice > > any obvious problem during my fio test. So for the vfio-ccw related > > part: > > Tested-by: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdj...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Thanks! > > To which patches may I add the tag? :) > The test should cover the vfio-ccw related part in patch #3, I assume. So add it there?
-- Dong Jia Shi
